<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VirtualBox vs VMware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:17:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-95</guid>
		<description>VirtualBox is indeed better than VMware Desktop in many respects: video (faster and video memory is configurable), disk access (simply faster), and sound support (better sounds with Intel ICH AC&#039;97). What I miss from VMware is easy networking and the Shrink Disk functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VirtualBox is indeed better than VMware Desktop in many respects: video (faster and video memory is configurable), disk access (simply faster), and sound support (better sounds with Intel ICH AC&#8217;97). What I miss from VMware is easy networking and the Shrink Disk functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsent</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>dsent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Check version 2.1.0, if you still interested.
They&#039;ve greatly improved network configuration - especially bridged networks configuration.
Also there are many other improvements and fixes - like full .vmdk support including snapshots and such.
Stability is still not as perfect as in VMWare, but it&#039;s ok for desktop :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check version 2.1.0, if you still interested.<br />
They&#8217;ve greatly improved network configuration &#8211; especially bridged networks configuration.<br />
Also there are many other improvements and fixes &#8211; like full .vmdk support including snapshots and such.<br />
Stability is still not as perfect as in VMWare, but it&#8217;s ok for desktop <img src='http://www.smert.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-93</guid>
		<description>There are two ways you can do this.

1) You can create a share on your computer and then map to that share from the virtual machine. Inside the virtual machine connect to your share &quot;\\IP Address\Share&quot;.

2) You can use the &quot;shared folders&quot; feature to basically do the same thing. You first have to setup a share by clicking the folder icon on the bottom right side of the running virtual machine. Then inside the virtual machine run &quot;net use t: \\vboxsvr\Share&quot;. You have to use the &quot;net use&quot; command since accessing it with Explorer will fail. Now under &quot;My Computer&quot; there will be a drive letter t: that you can access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two ways you can do this.</p>
<p>1) You can create a share on your computer and then map to that share from the virtual machine. Inside the virtual machine connect to your share &#8220;\\IP Address\Share&#8221;.</p>
<p>2) You can use the &#8220;shared folders&#8221; feature to basically do the same thing. You first have to setup a share by clicking the folder icon on the bottom right side of the running virtual machine. Then inside the virtual machine run &#8220;net use t: \\vboxsvr\Share&#8221;. You have to use the &#8220;net use&#8221; command since accessing it with Explorer will fail. Now under &#8220;My Computer&#8221; there will be a drive letter t: that you can access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-92</guid>
		<description>How do I transfer files from my computer (xp) to virtual box (xp)???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I transfer files from my computer (xp) to virtual box (xp)???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-91</guid>
		<description>It is most likely the same thing that happens to all of my file transfers. I would double check to see if it is sending a small portion (a few kb) and then stopping. I have found no work around. You might want to try bridged networking and see if the problem persists. I read sometime ago that people weren&#039;t able to duplicate the issue using bridged (according to the bug report for slow transfers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is most likely the same thing that happens to all of my file transfers. I would double check to see if it is sending a small portion (a few kb) and then stopping. I have found no work around. You might want to try bridged networking and see if the problem persists. I read sometime ago that people weren&#8217;t able to duplicate the issue using bridged (according to the bug report for slow transfers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I have upgraded to 1.5.6 Win2K guest Ubuntu Fiesty Host - I am still getting very slow file copys to Windows shares.  If I could solve this problem I would have no complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have upgraded to 1.5.6 Win2K guest Ubuntu Fiesty Host &#8211; I am still getting very slow file copys to Windows shares.  If I could solve this problem I would have no complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-89</guid>
		<description>How odd. I guess I&#039;ll have to try that sometime to see if I can get it working too. I&#039;m sure Windows 98 will run extremely fast in VirtualBox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd. I guess I&#8217;ll have to try that sometime to see if I can get it working too. I&#8217;m sure Windows 98 will run extremely fast in VirtualBox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuong</title>
		<link>http://www.smert.net/2007/09/01/virtualbox-vs-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smert.net/?p=32#comment-88</guid>
		<description>With the windows 98 install I found if you gave it some time to configure itself and restarted the machine a few times windows 98 figured something out and the garbage suddenly displayed the characteristic windows 98 desktop. I think I waited 5 minutes each time at the garbage screen and restarted twice and it worked in VirtualBox (Host Ubuntu 7.10).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the windows 98 install I found if you gave it some time to configure itself and restarted the machine a few times windows 98 figured something out and the garbage suddenly displayed the characteristic windows 98 desktop. I think I waited 5 minutes each time at the garbage screen and restarted twice and it worked in VirtualBox (Host Ubuntu 7.10).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
